{myadvertisements[zone_1]}
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Polaris isn't listed?
#9
(04-22-2017, 12:14 AM)CelNav57 Wrote: Rumata,

I'm glad it worked out alright for you.  Let me know if you ever need a Nautical Almanac for a specific year not already found on TheNauticalAlmanac.com and I'll make it for you in the format you wish- compact or regular.

CelNav57
Johannes H.

Thank you, CelNav57.  So far all the problems related to 1993. But I know whom I need to contact if I need some bizarre year's data. And I use Pub.229 for intercept solutions. I found out that working with LHA of a specific star/planet but not on LHA Aries is fine. For declination correction I go to the Table 5 in the end of NA "Correctionb to TAbulated Altitude for minutes of declination." I used Pub.249 for a while but found for some reasons 229 more convenient. Personal preference, of course.
Reply
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}


Messages In This Thread
Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-20-2017, 06:14 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by c_davidson - 04-20-2017, 12:32 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-20-2017, 04:47 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by EdCa - 04-20-2017, 07:41 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-20-2017, 11:38 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by CelNav57 - 04-21-2017, 01:03 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-21-2017, 03:31 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 05-01-2017, 08:09 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by CelNav57 - 04-22-2017, 12:14 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-22-2017, 02:33 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rdutton - 04-22-2017, 10:55 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-22-2017, 06:09 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 05-02-2017, 04:19 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 05-04-2017, 02:43 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by CelNav57 - 05-05-2017, 02:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
{myadvertisements[zone_2]}