Regarding assumed longitude using intercept method.

[Rumata]

-Thank you,  Peter!  As I've mentioned in my original post,  I  thought  I  asked this question before. Thanks  for  referring  me to  it.  Let  me clarify  a few points.  I  know that  I need to get  whole number  LHA.  And yes,  you're right, that SHAs  almost  always  have decimal parts.  And   if  I follow your  suggestion, I just need  to  subtract/add  longitude to GHA ,  which  gives me  definite  assumed longitude.  And not  to  try to simplify  written equations where assumed longitude eventually  will  have different value.  Will try  this approach.