{myadvertisements[zone_1]}
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Regarding assumed longitude using intercept method.
#1
Gentlemen,

Using intercept method  I came to kind of  strange  situation.  Let me be  as brief as possible and to the point.

Calculating LHA for observed star.  Western longitude, north latitude. Wrote  formula to calculate it based on grpaphical representation  og GHA Aries, SHA of the star  and longitude ( assumed) .  I got LHA  but depending on the order  I  added and subtracted data  assumed  longitude became different.  But  LHA  was the same.  

Now, specifics:
LHA of the star = GHA Aries +SHA of the star -360- Longitude assumed  = (GHA Aries -  Longitude assumed) + SHA - 360. (  I just made a drawing  to visualize the data  , and from  that drawing  came  those two equations.)

Again,  results are identical,  but assumed longitude in this particular case  is different  in about 25 minutes of longitude.

I think, I asked this question before, but can't find the answer. 

So when I start to  plot  this star position, different  longitudes assumed made   it a little bit difficult to do it right  the first time.  Of course,  I can plot  two positions for the same star and see which one makes  more sense, but maybe  there is a simple way  to go through this.

Thank you.
Reply
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}


Messages In This Thread
Regarding assumed longitude using intercept method. - by Rumata - 11-14-2024, 02:26 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
{myadvertisements[zone_2]}