{myadvertisements[zone_1]}
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Polaris isn't listed?
#10
Rumata-

Working with paper is more enjoyable than electronics but lugging around Pub. 229 wouldn't be so bad if I considered that, no, I'm probably not going to sail around the world so all volumes aren't needed. Only, at my latitudes of sailing, Vol 3 is necessary.

What has kept me from using 229 for stars with declinations over 29° is using the Hc and the Z formula and a calculator. Hc can be calculated using the simple Casio fx-300ES (about $10) in about 8 seconds. Z takes around 10 seconds. Whenever using those formulas and calculator a thought passes through my mind when looking at the device that, "one of these days when you're most needed you wont work".

You can find the formulas here-

https://thenauticalalmanac.com/Formulas.html

Roland
Reply
{myadvertisements[zone_3]}


Messages In This Thread
Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-20-2017, 06:14 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by c_davidson - 04-20-2017, 12:32 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-20-2017, 04:47 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by EdCa - 04-20-2017, 07:41 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-20-2017, 11:38 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by CelNav57 - 04-21-2017, 01:03 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-21-2017, 03:31 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 05-01-2017, 08:09 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by CelNav57 - 04-22-2017, 12:14 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-22-2017, 02:33 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rdutton - 04-22-2017, 10:55 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 04-22-2017, 06:09 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 05-02-2017, 04:19 PM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by Rumata - 05-04-2017, 02:43 AM
RE: Why Polaris isn't listed? - by CelNav57 - 05-05-2017, 02:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)
{myadvertisements[zone_2]}